devbandi kazzab in Haram sharif lying, and slandering alahazrat

personally, i do not like this sheyr. and as sadru'sh shariah raHimahullah hinted, if it was not said by a scholar (whom sadrush shariah apparently knew) he would have ruled it kufr.

the sheyr should be avoided. and may Allah ta'ala forgive the shaykh who said it. after all, devbandis try to rationalise so many things saying: "such things are said in poetry and are not to be taken literally" - what is the problem if we say the same thing only to avoid takfir?

the ta'wil made by sadru'sh shariah is only to avoid takfir. is it not surprising that the people who believe that their Lord "DESCENDS" to the heaven and refuse to accept ta'wil of "nuzul" being nuzul of raHmah, preach to us about tanzih?

do the wahabis not believe that "Nuzul of Allah" (al-iyadhu billah) is haqiqi? ta'ala Allahu uluwwan kabeera. then what is the depraved man whining about?

---
so here are objective answers about the couplet.

1. the couplet is prima facie incompatible with the aqidah of ahl al-sunnah.

2. however, with the ta'wil that the poet meant that it was the mercy of Allah that descended - irrespective of how far fetched the ta'wil is, and unconvincing, the person is not deemed kafir so long as he does not believe in the literal meaning of that couplet.

3. the couplet should be avoided and considered as an aberration.

4. for those who may think we are equivocating: we believe that Allah ta'ala is free from nuzul (literally) or many such words indicating anthropomorphism. we believe that Allah ta'ala made "istiwa" on the arsh and we do not say that it was physical. the ta'wil, that it COULD mean istiylaa is accepted, and the tafwiD: only Allah knows its true meaning is the best answer.

Allah ta'ala is the Creator and RasulAllah sallALlahu alayhi wa sallam is His creation. neither is RasulAllah sallALlahu alayhi wa sallam god/khuda (al-iyadhu billah) nor is Allah ta'ala anthropomorphic. ta'ala Allahu uluwwan kabeera.

===
Allah ta'ala knows best.


-----
falsely attributing alahazrat with such a couplet is dandy. do the devbandis do not want to hear what is found in THEIR books?

kah doon? kah doon?*



*those in the know will know what i am hinting at.

 

fatawa amjadiyyah 4/278-279

 

this man is sitting in haram sharif and lying. what can one do about it?


the lines:
wahi jo mustawi e arsh hai khuda ho kar
utar pada hai madinah mein mustafa ho kar

---
these are lines by someone else, AND certainly not by alahazrat. those who attribute this to alahazrat do iftira which can be expected from shameless and faithless oafs.

---
sadru'sh shariah was asked about this line and he replied that it should not be taken literally and a ta'wil can be made because the person who penned the lines was a cautious scholar. he also presented a ta'wil. in the footnotes, it is explained that the critics alter the line to: "mustawi e arsh THAA" instead of "mustawi e arsh HAI" and these line are by shaykh aasi. [see fatawa amjadiyyah, 4/278-279]

---

then comes the claim of alahazrat saying: "in my experience" about how prostitutes use their money. if he has fear of Allah, he must produce evidence. otherwise, he richly deserves:

 

He is not somebody new but an old veteran stationed in Masjid ul Haram Makkah by the wahabis targeting urdu speaking pilgrims. Those who have been there might have come across him as I believe he is the only one doing daily urdu discourses there.

He is a big dajjal and does his utmost best to deceive urdu speaking masses over there. A lot more dangerous than tariq zaleel. I had even had an argument with a person from my hajj group who used to attend his discourses several years ago!

 

i think we are reaching a stage where we will not be able to respond to the accursed lies of these shayateen.
how can one answer lies and false accusations of this sort?

 

Look at this new Deobandi Jahil



These are nothing but lies